In
1943 the Navy issued a requirement for a new series of carrier-based
attack aircraft, looking to combineheretofore separate missions of
scout/dive bomber and torpedo bomber. The venerable Dauntless had been
replaced by the problematic Curtis Helldiver and the TBF/M Avenger had
assumed the torpedo and bomber missions. Drawing on lessons learned to
date from CV-ops in the Pacific and anticipating increased demands on
striking power from the carriers, the Navy’s proposal called for
“Bomber Torpedo,” or “BT” proposals.
The BT was to be single seat, a
reflection of increasing speed from increasingly powerful engines, with
emphasis on load-carrying ability and overall performance. Unlike the
Avenger, stores would be carried externally which would not only
improve ease of arming on busy and
tight flight decks, but expand the range and amount of ordnance to be
carried. Several manufacturers were assigned development, but two
principals emerged – Douglas with the XBT2D-1
(designed by Ed Heinemann) and the Martin XBTM-1. The Martin entry
utilized the experimental Pratt & Whitney XR-4360 radial which
generated close to 3,000 hp.
The
Navy awarded Martin a contract for two prototypes in Jan 44 for what
was to be known as the AM-1 “Mauler.” First flight was in August and
subsequently, the Navy increased that order to 750 in anticipation of
the invasion of Japan.
Like
so many other aircraft of that period, the Mauler suffered
developmental problems, pressing the envelope as it was in combining
conventional designs with
experimental/developmental equipment. The size of the engine and
aircraft was such that it was difficult to fly, especially in the
CV-environment. This mandated the development of a complicated
hydraulic boost system (which all of us who’ve flown and maintained
*know* never leak…) and off-setting of the engine mount by 2-degrees to
account for the massive torque of the R-4360. Additional work was
required on the prop spinner, wing and tail. Eventually, a re-designed
AM-1 entered the fleet in 1947, but in reduced numbers as production
was substantially cut following the end of the war. It was also facing
the AD-1 Skyraider which grew from the ABT2D following an extensive
Heinemann re-design effort (he hated the original Navy mandated-design).
Joining
the fleet in 1948, the AM-1, at first labeled “Able Mabel”, quickly
made a name for itself –and it was less than complimentary. The “Awful
Monster” still had troubles in the CV-environment with an unfortunate
tendency to violently vibrate in the tail section following a trap. Of
course, this was less than desirable for a carrier-based aircraft and
in spite of a tailhook redesign to resolve this issue, more time was
lost in terms of fleet acceptance and in growing competition from the
AD-1. By all accounts, the Mauler lost points to the Skyraider in the
air and on the deck. One maintainer allowed as how it took three days
just to change the 56 spark plugs – one day each to remove the cowl and
complicated ducts and replace them and another day just to swap out the
plugs. The complicated wheel retraction system frequently failed,
leading at one point to 6 belly landings in 4 months at NAS Jax. Then
too, there remained the ever-present pool of hydraulic fluid underneath
the aircraft.
Aviators came to despise the AM-1 and loved the AD-1, especially in dive bombing with its big
barn door dive brakes, one comparing it to hanging from a maneuverable
parasol in a dive whichsignificantly improved bombing accuracy. The
AM-1 was a big, heavy aircraft and in spite of the larger engine, could
barely get airborne in a deck run with 28 knots of wind over the deck
and no load. The AD-1, on the other hand, could take a 3,000 lb load on
a 330 ft deck run under similar conditions.
Finally,
the Mauler was a real bear to land and had an unfortunate tendency to
act like it was on springs if all three wheels didn’t hit the deck at
the same time. During the 1949 deployment of VA-44 on Midway, at one
point an AM bounced completely over the barrier and into the parked
aircraft in front of it. Fortunately no one was injured. Clearly, the
Mauler was not destined for fame as a frontline, CV-based attack
aircraft and the Navy was rapidly reaching that conclusion.
Not
to be deterred, in 1949 Martin test pilot Pat Tibbs flew a
Mauler with
an incredible payload of 10,648 lbs (3 x 2200 lb torpedoes, 12 x 500lb
bombs and 800 rounds of 20mm ammo) which set a single engine record. It
probably also set a single engine record for a take-off run too and
undoubtedly a pig to fly, not unlike
this configuration…
By
1950 the Mauler was removed from Fleet service and passed to the
Reserves which used them until 1953. Eighteen were converted to
electronic counter-measures aircraft, but this too was short lived as
the Skyraider proved more capable at this and other mods for Fleet
missions. Today a small handful
still exists and maybe found at the National Museum of Naval Aviation
in Pensacola and the former NAS Tillamook in western Oregon.
Footnote:
There remains some controversy
surrounding the AM-1 and its engine
configuration with some claiming it
actually flew with the smaller
Wright 3350. According to the model specifications for all
those
produced at
this website, the AM-1 was exclusively powered by the R-4360. There may have been
subsequent field mods to use the Wright engine instead.
Comments