No seriously… This is not a joke. There is a storm on the horizon…
(Image: U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Elliott Fabrizio)
The continued failure of Congress and the Pentagon to properly procure US Navy Strike Fighters is coming to a head! Of course this is merely preaching to the choir for many of you.
Because of the high operational tempo in Iraq and Afghanistan, the F/A-18 C/Ds “are overutilized” and wearing out, which is causing “constant turbulence among the air wings” as air crews and service crews are transferred from squadron to squadron “to get the deploying ships up to where they should be,” Each of the 10 carrier air wings is expected to have four squadrons for a total of 40, but there are only 37 active squadrons, including 36 Navy and one Marine Corps. – Vice Adm (Ret.) Robert Dunn, Pres. ANA
Over at Aviation Leak Week, they are reporting how the plan to SLEP more legacy Hornets will in effect create an increased shortfall in deployable strike fighters.
Extending the service life of F/A-18C/D Hornets to close a U.S. Navy fighter gap could still lead to a tactical air shortage because of the amount of time the Hornets will be out of service pending their upgrade, naval aviation analysts said July 21.
Ronald O’Rourke, a naval affairs expert with the Congressional Research Service (CRS), said the service life extension program for Hornets, aimed at allowing them to fly an additional 1,400 hours, is one way to solve the expected shortfall in carrier-based fighters. Officials have testified before Congress that the Navy and Marine Corps could be short between 125 and 243 aircraft by the mid- to late-2010s (Aerospace DAILY, May 21).
…The Hornet upgrade could take an estimated 1,100-2,200 man-hours per aircraft, removing them from the active force and creating a different kind of gap, according to the president of the Association of Naval Aviation, Vice Adm. Robert Dunn (ret.). Speeding up F-35 production is unlikely to happen soon, Dunn added.
Super Hornets to the rescue???… Not so fast…
Congressional committees have yet to agree on how to acquire more Super Hornets. The Senate Armed Services Committee wants to buy nine more aircraft but won’t approve a multiyear procurement plan. The House Armed Services Committee took the opposite approach, while the defense subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee favors doing both.
Simply put, the needle is stuck in the groove of a never ending record (there’s a hair on your Compact disc to you Generation Y-ers). Fighter aircraft shortfalls and ever increasing maintenance requirements are not new to NAVAIR. Ever since the end of WWII equipment supply levels of our tactical aviation has been behind the curve (maybe with the exception of the Regan years when a 600 ship navy was a goal). Making sure the Civilian Leadership in Washington is aware of the consequences of these shortfalls has not been the strength of the US Navy. Increased op tempos are always to be expected and planned for, yet we all know the US Congress does not possess a wealth of foresight.
So the question is, who do we write to, talk to, yell at?
To start here is a list of the Armed Services Committee members:
- House Armed Services Committee Members [List]
- Senate Armed Services Committee Members [List]
As Tailhookers, interested in the Security of our Nation, but more importantly the SAFETY or our Aviators, we can do some good if we let our voice be heard. Don’t be shy.
(Stacked F/A-18s image:U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class John P. Curtis)
Recent Comments