Apparently we are so afraid of our own politically correct, gender-race-religion-neutral shadow the 5 sided puzzle palace cannot even attribute probable motivations in the Ft. Hood massacre. From Time Magazine:
The Fort Hood Report: Why No Mention of Islam?
The U.S. military's just-released report into the Fort Hood shootings spends 86 pages detailing various slipups by Army officers but not once mentions Major Nidal Hasan by name or even discusses whether the killings may have had anything to do with the suspect's view of his Muslim faith. And as Congress opens two days of hearings on Wednesday into the Pentagon probe of the Nov. 5 attack that left 13 dead, lawmakers want explanations for that omission.John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 commission and Navy Secretary during the Reagan Administration, says a reluctance to cause offense by citing Hasan's view of his Muslim faith and the U.S. military's activities in Muslim countries as a possible trigger for his alleged rampage reflects a problem that has gotten worse in the 40 years that Lehman has spent in and around the U.S. military. The Pentagon report's silence on Islamic extremism "shows you how deeply entrenched the values of political correctness have become," he told TIME on Tuesday. "It's definitely getting worse, and is now so ingrained that people no longer smirk when it happens." [more]
Leadership in the military is taught the principles of being "apolitical" when making decisions, analyzing actions, and identifying future strategies. "Apolitical" is not synonymous with 'politically correct." If FACTS are avoided in an effort to 'not offend' we are negligent to our troops, our oaths, and our country. PC has no place in after action reports! Period!
-JC
Your thoughts?



Recent Comments